crg logo  
Too Old for TV?
The Portrayal of Older People on Television
Executive Summary














































Guy Cumberbatch, Sally Gauntlett, Victoria Littlejohns,
Samantha Woods and Cheryl Stephenson.  

By 2040, 34% of the UK's electorate will be aged over 60.  They make up television's most loyal audience, continuing to watch while younger audiences gradually decline.  In fact the over 65s watch half as much television again as the 34 to 54 year old group (37 hours a week versus 25 hours).  How well served are older people by television's representation of them?

This report describes a monitoring study of one week's prime time television.  It was designed to examine both the frequency with which older people (defined as those aged 60 and over) were represented alongside details of the manner in which they were portrayed.  The sample was of one composite week captured between 13th March and 30th April 1999 and covered five terrestrial channels (BBC1, BBC2, ITV, C4 and C5) plus one satellite channel (Sky One).  It included all programmes between 1800 hrs and 2200 hrs except animation.

The sample comprised a total of 335 video recorded programmes (144.9 hours of output) which were analysed according to pre determined coding schedules.  These categorised information on television demographics, level of appearance, social interaction, social integration and similar issues relevant to the stereotyping of older people.  To estimate the relative frequency with which older people appeared, a character count was made of all people who enjoyed a speaking role in each programme.  Additionally, a comparison sample was drawn of two younger people from each programme (one male and one female under the age of 60).  This allowed the examination of possible differences between the treatment of older and younger people.  This report examines these overall patterns but focusses specifically on factual and fictional programmes using both quantitative and qualitative measures.  The main findings are reported below.  

A total of 5,074 participants were counted in this sample, of which 362 were aged 60 or over, representing just 7% of the television population

1. Television World versus Real World
On television one in fourteen (7%) people were 60 years or over compared with one in five (21%) people in the real world.

On television older men far outnumbered older women (70% male versus 30% female) while the reverse is true in the real world (57% female versus 43% male).

On television those in the 25-44 age group occurred twice as frequently (61%) as in the real world (30%).


TV
Real World
Age Bands
%
%
1-24
12
30
25-34
32
16
35-44
29
14
45-59
20
18
60 and over
7
21
Total
100
99

2. Channel Differences

Older people achieved their highest level of representation on BBC2 - well above the average level of representation for all channels combined and almost five times the level of representation on Sky One. They comprised:

  • 14% of the speaking population on BBC2
  • 7% of the speaking population on BBC1
  • 6% of the speaking population on Channel 4
  • 6% of the speaking population on ITV
  • 6% of the speaking population on Channel 5
  • 3% of the speaking population on Sky One

3. Programme Differences: Factual Programmes

Older people made up 8% of the population of factual programmes and older men outnumbered older women by a ratio of more than 5:2 (72% male, 28% female).

In factual television the demographics are the reverse of the real world where older females outnumber older males.



TV Ratio
Real World Ratio

Male:Female
Male:Female
60-64
78:22
49:51
65-74
70:30
46:54
75-84
68:32
38:62
85+
33:67
26:74

Older people were particularly under represented in prominent roles:

  • 3% of major presenters were older people (97% younger)
  • 0.2% of minor presenters were older people (99.8% younger)
  • 9% of interviewees were older people (91% younger)

Older participants were:

  • More likely to experience positive interactions (49% older versus 42% younger)
  • Quite likely to be portrayed as being economically active (36% were in employment)
  • More likely to be portrayed as achieving something (15% older versus 7% younger)
  • Counter stereotypical portrayals of older people occurred in 9% of cases.

Other issues of age:

  • Stories where age was a focus occurred with 8% of older and 3% of younger people.
  • On-going health difficulties were noted in 3% of older and 0.5% of younger people.
  • Older people were more likely to be portrayed as victims (9% versus 5% younger).
  • Prejudice or discrimination towards older people occurred in 4% of cases.

4.  Programmes Differences: Fictional Programmes

Older people made up 6% of the fictional population and older males outnumbered older females by almost 2:1 (66% male versus 34% female).

While a greater prominence was achieved in fictional compared with factual programmes, older people did not fare any better than their overall fictional programme average:

  • 6% of major roles were older people (94% younger).
  • 7% of minor roles were older people (93% younger).
  • 6% of incidental roles were older people )94% younger).

Positive images emerged where, for example, older people were:

  • More likely to experience positive interactions (46% older, 36% younger).
  • Less likely to experience negative interaction (13% older, 18% younger).
  • More likely to interact with other age groups (33% versus 25%).
  • Less likely to mix with their own age group (24% versus 46%).
  • 40% were portrayed as economically active.  
  • Counter stereotypes of older people were noted in almost one quarter (24%) of cases such as white water rafting or attending discos for young people.

Other findings were more mixed:

  • Older people were far less often portrayed in sexually active roles
  • 8% of older people were portrayed as heterosexual, 46% younger
  • 10% of older people were in a sexual relationship, 29% younger
  • Older people were more likely to be portrayed as eccentric (6% versus 1%).
  • In 8% of cases older people were used by the programme makers to raise issues of prejudice or discrimination.
  • But in twice as many cases (16%) older people were victims of such discrimination without any attempt to raise awareness of the issues.

5.  Trend Data

This study essentially replicated an earlier content analysis by The Communications Research Group (Older People on Television, 1998) which also covered UK Gold.  This channel was excluded from the present study since it offers very little contemporary output.  Therefore, to compare the samples, the earlier study was reanalysed to exclude the UK Gold data.  Key points from the comparison are:

In 1998 the population yielded 10% older people on television, falling to 7% in the present study.  This drop was sustained across factual programming (1998 = 10%, 1999 = 8%) and fictional programming (1998 = 8%, 1999 = 6%).

This drop was also seen across most channels:


Channel
1998
1999
BBC2
16%
14% of the populations were older people
C4
11%
6%
ITV
10%
6%
BBC1
9%
7%
C5
6%
6%
Sky One
4%
3%

Compared with the 1998 data, levels of appearance were also attenuated:

  • In 1998, 13% of older people were major contributors to a programme falling to 10% in 1999.
  • In 1998, 10% of older people made a minor contribution falling to 8% in 1999.

In factual programmes the 1998 data revealed 43% of older people as economically active (i.e. working) falling to 36% in 1999.  In 1998, age as an issue was raised in 7% of older cases, compared with 8% in 1999. However, examples of counter stereotyping of older people fell from 12% of cases in 1998 to 9% in 1999.  One figure did not change: both in 1998 and 1999 some 15% of portrayals involved stories of achievement by older people.

In the case of fictional programming the proportion of older people portrayed as economically active fell from 52% in 1998 to 40% in 1999.  One of the few positive differences was in the incidence of counter stereotypes behaviour which stood at 12% of characters in 1998 but rose to 24% in 1999.  

Overall, the comparison data offers little to challenge concerns that older people are considerably under represented and even marginalised on television.  It is true that one week samples are small to detect tiny trends reliably, but the two snapshots of broadcasting confirm a rather gloomy picture only mitigated by a generally positive image when older people manage to appear.


Conclusion

The under representation of older people on television is a cause for particular concern.  Older people contributed a mere 7% to the television population in this sample - one third of the real world figure of  21%.

Moreover this under representation is compounded by a gender imbalance where older men outnumber older women on television by two to one such that older women are almost invisible citizens.

The television population reveals a strong clustering of people in the 25-44 age band (twice that of the real world) who from these data should not be planning a career in this business much beyond this.  We cannot be sure that the two snapshots have captured a genuine deterioration in the role of older people over time.  But taken together they certainly reveal the irony that the people who watch the most television (i.e. older people) are among the most excluded from it and must confirm suspicions that the third age has yet to touch broadcasting.


Return to Top
Return to Publications & Reports