|
Guy Cumberbatch, Gary W Woods
and Victoria Littlejohns
The Television
Audience
- Industry
data from BARB show that average viewing for the 12 months
ending December 2000 was 26 hours per week. Most viewers watched
between 15 and 35 hours per week.
- Heavy
viewers (35 hours+) made up more than one fifth of respondents in
this survey. In the regions, Scotland, Wales and the Midlands had the
most
heavy viewers .
- Light
viewers (15 hours or less) made up almost one in five respondents and
were found most frequently in Northern Ireland.
- Multi-channel
growth was slow. New subscribers were most likely
to be Light viewers and from social groups AB.
- Those
interested in obtaining a multi-channel service were outnumbered almost
three fold by those who were not.
- A
declining minority of multi-channel subscribers had more than one
television connected to receive the services and this was lowest among
digital subscribers.
Technology
in the Home
- Over
one half of children now have a television in their bedroom.
Highest rates were reported by parents who were Heavy viewers or
multi-channel subscribers.
- Internet
access rose dramatically to 18% in the 2000 survey, due mainly
to increased availability in the home.
- Over
one half of ABs and Light viewers had Internet access, more than three
times that of Heavy viewers or DEs.
- Two
thirds of viewers claimed never to have used the Internet. Of
these, nine out of ten said they had no intention of getting such
access in the next six months.
- One in
five respondents were willing to pay extra for Interactive services
such as home banking/shopping/the Internet.
- There
has been a modest increase in the number of subscribers using
Pay-Per-View, with more interest shown for films than sporting events.
- Video
recorder ownership and especially VCR use showed a decline year on year.
Viewing Habits and Preferences
- ITV
was the first choice channel, even in multi-channel homes.
- Considerable
demographic differences appear in programme preferences.
- Interest
in Soap operas and Quiz shows has increased while interest in
Situation comedies and older/classic films has declined.
- Among
those claiming they did not have enough chance to watch television were
parents, ABs and C1s and Light viewers.
Programme
Standards
- The
majority (59%) thought that programme standards had not changed.
Twice as many said programmes had got worse as said they had improved
(28% + 13% respectively).
- Multi-channel
subscribers were more satisfied than terrestrial only
viewers.
- Heavy viewers were the most likely to
think that programmes had improved.
- Women,
those over 35 years old and broadsheet readers were most likely to say
programmes had got worse
- Viewers
complained about increased repeats, swearing and offensive language
and violence.
- Praise
was given for better quality, wider range and more interesting
programmes.
- Multi-channel
viewers were far less critical of their subscription
services than terrestrial-only viewers were of their television
opportunities.
Offence and
Acceptability
- Viewers
reporting offence at programme content continues to fall.
In 2000 it was the lowest in the survey’s history at 29% of respondents
reporting offence. The decline is notably in the older age groups.
- The
most common cause of offence was swearing and offensive language
followed by violence, then sex/nudity.
- However,
more viewers claimed to have switched off their sets or
changed channels because of violence, followed closely by swearing and
offensive language and then sex/nudity.
- Women
were twice as likely to report switching off as men.
- Other
groups most likely to be offended were terrestrial only users, those
from Northern Ireland, Wales and the South as well as parents with
children at home.
Sources of News
- Television
increasingly is the main source of world news at the expense
of newspapers and radio. Television was mentioned most frequently
by Heavy viewers, tabloid readers, those completing their education at
16 and those in social grades C2DE.
- For radio, the reverse was shown,
being mentioned most frequently by broadsheet readers, those who
continued their education to 20+ and social grades AB.
- Television
was least likely to be mentioned as the main source of world
news in London and most frequently in the South. Newspapers were
cited most frequently in the North and Scotland and least often in
Northern Ireland and Wales. For radio, the peak was in London and
the trough in Wales.
- Sources
of local news also showed television to be the most frequently
first mentioned, closely followed by newspapers and radio.
- Regional
variations were considerable in the main source of local
news. In Northern Ireland and Wales over one half mentioned
television - double that of London. Newspapers received high
nominations in both Scotland and London, especially compared with
Northern Ireland. Radio was
most popular in the North and least in Wales.
Impartiality
- Overall,
the majority (59%) believed television to be fair and
impartial.
- Three
out of ten thought that the channels they watched showed either
favouritism or discrimination. Those most likely to claim some
bias
were: Light viewers, broadsheet readers, those interested in politics,
educated to 20+, social groups ABC1, the under 24s and those 65+.
- Groups
thought to be favoured were political parties/politicians generally,
followed by the government/party in power. Here the year on year
rise is considerable. The most frequently mentioned group as the
victim of discrimination was minorities in general, closely
followed by ethnic minorities.
- One
quarter accused BBC1 of political bias, a level higher than previous
years, followed by BBC2, both well ahead of ITV while Channel 4
attracted little criticism. More thought the BBC was pro
Conservative than pro Labour. ITV received less criticism but
more accused it of a pro Labour than Conservative bias.
- Considering
all the respondents claiming political bias on the main
terrestrial channels, the split was 51% Labour, 49% Conservative.
Attitudes to
Advertising
- Annual
comparisons showed that more viewers felt advertisements were
entertaining this year. However, more complained that they
interrupted programmes, films or motor racing.
- Viewers
saying that more advertising would be acceptable on ITV/C4/C5
rose to 11% from 7% in 1999. Heavy viewers were much more likely
to tolerate increased advertising.
- Regions
complaining there was too much advertising were the Midlands,
the South and Northern Ireland. However Northern Ireland was the
region most likely to say more advertising would be acceptable.
- Those
claiming that advertisements are misleading or offensive declined
dramatically.
Regulation
- Awareness
of the watershed was claimed by nine out of ten respondents,
which is among the highest rates recorded. Eight out of ten
viewers correctly reported that it started at 9 pm. Awareness was
higher among parents as were correct responses.
- More
viewers this year said that parents should take responsibility
for children not seeing unsuitable programmes. More parents
(nearly
one half) said that they had actively prevented their child watching a
programme in the past 12 months.
- Liberal
views increased. More viewers agreed that people should
be allowed to pay extra to watch sexually explicit programmes.
- Northern
Ireland was the least permissive region about violence or
sexually explicit material or about allowing programmes which might
offend even a minority of people.
- One quarter could not think of where
they should complain if they were upset or offended by programmes on
BBC or ITV/C4/C5. Twice as many multi-channel subscribers could
not say where they might complain about pay TV.
- Two
thirds of Internet users admitted to not knowing where they might
complain about Internet content and six out of ten could not say who
might
regulate or control it.
- When
invited to choose from a list of ways people could restrict Internet
access, most parents still could not offer a view about their preferred
system (especially those with 4-9 year olds).
- Despite
the growth of ‘smart’ remote controls, which parents can use to block
channels to prevent children from accessing them, very few
multi-channel parents used such systems and large numbers of such
respondents seemed unaware that this could be achieved.
|